Typically we think of technology assisted review (TAR) as a tool for finding relevant documents. Sometimes, however, TAR shines best as a tool for identifying irrelevant documents. Compared to even the most well-refined search terms, TAR can draw a much more precise line between documents that are not relevant and documents that might be relevant. This approach offers a very effective culling mechanism.
We all know that document review is generally very expensive. In fact, in the often quoted Da Silva Moore case, the defendants stated that they expected their review costs to be about $5/document. On a 500,000 document case, that’s $2.5 million dollars! With privilege review being one of the most expensive types of document review, it seems a likely target for cost reduction measures. But, how do you do so without risking waiver? There are technologies out there that can help.
Last month we were among the first ediscovery service providers to add Equivio’s Zoom to our service offerings. So far, it has been a fantastic augmentation to our ReviewSmart (Lighthouse’s proprietary Technology Assisted Review) product. Our internal experts, led by a lawyer with a Master of Science in Computational Linguistics, can leverage Zoom’s capabilities to dramatically reduce our clients’ review costs while maintaining defensibility. In fact, we are currently using it to reduce a client’s costs in a large multi-language matter.
With all the buzz about Technology Assisted Review (“TAR”) lately ( also known as predictive coding tools, such as ReviewSmart, Equivio’s Relevance and kCura’s Relativity Assisted Review), I noticed it’s often large companies and big law firms who are asking about it. You may be saying, “well of course, they are the ones with the huge document productions.” Small to medium size firms should take note – TAR can be an unbelievably useful tool for these firms, especially those who typically deal with multiple litigations in the 50k-150k...
Judge Peck’s recent opinion in Da Silva Moore highlights technology assisted review’s growing importance in the ediscovery toolkit, and offers a helpful roadmap for applying this process in future cases.