<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none;" alt="" src="https://dc.ads.linkedin.com/collect/?pid=513385&amp;fmt=gif">


Published Tue, March 22, 2011 by Debora Motyka Jones, Esq.

Although I advocated self-collection in my recent post about Facebook Self-Collections,  I want to note that self-collections are usually not a good way to go.  In fact, the ediscovery Team recently posted a blog article about the pitfalls of self-collection.  Ralph Losey pointed to a recent opinion out of the Eastern District of Texas, Green v. Blitz U.S.A., Inc, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20353 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 1, 2011), where the Court entered sanctions for bad faith withholding of evidence against a party who engaged in self-collection.

Facebook Collections

Published Mon, March 21, 2011 by Debora Motyka Jones, Esq.

As the use of social media increases, so does its relevance to litigation.  We are now seeing more and more people wanting to collect data from social media sites such as Facebook and Twitter.  Initially, a Facebook collection meant getting a user’s permission and sending a subpoena to Facebook.  But now, Facebook has streamlined the process by allowing users to collect their own information.

Quote of the Day

Published Fri, March 18, 2011 by Debora Motyka Jones, Esq.

I had to laugh when I saw the below quote on K&L Gates’ E-Discovery Blog.

Making Defensible eDiscovery Decisions

Published Thu, March 17, 2011 by Debora Motyka Jones, Esq.

When dealing with discovery, there is a need to find the right balance between collecting all the potentially relevant data in the universe and the cost to do so. But, how does one do that while complying one’s discovery obligations? In general, you need to show good faith that you preserved relevant evidence. Moreover, FRCP 37(c)(1) requires substantial justification for “non-compliance” with FRCP 26 production obligations. Therefore, when defending a motion for sanctions, you need to be able to show the reasoning behind why an item was...

Studies on Software Retrieval

Published Wed, March 09, 2011 by Debora Motyka Jones, Esq.

Ever wondered what research is being done on the plethora of tools in the ediscovery space?  In my last post, I alluded to a study in my quote from Judge Grimm’s opinion in Victor Stanley. He was referring to the Text Retrieval Conference (TREC) Legal Track administered by the US National Institute of Standards (NIST). This is an interesting program that facilitates research on the effectiveness of search methodologies. A variety of methods have been tested including Boolean queries and statistical analysis of terms across a set of data.

Sign Up For The Illuminating eDiscovery Blog

Lighthouse’s Illuminating eDiscovery Blog features thought leadership pieces ranging from simple tips and tricks and industry event takeaways, to case law changes and ediscovery standards. These pieces are developed by technology and legal experts and focused on providing readers with practical tips that  they can put in place in their professional lives.