<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none;" alt="" src="https://dc.ads.linkedin.com/collect/?pid=513385&amp;fmt=gif">

By Josh Yildirim

Published on Mon, October 9, 2017

All posts by this person

Co-authored by Josh Yildirim & Rob Iuliano

As an experienced ediscovery professional who witnesses on a daily basis how evolving technology is rapidly changing our industry, I regularly ask myself why productions are so often stuck in the past and continue to rely on an old and dated production format that was created over 25 years ago.

I’m talking about the TIFF files that are created as part of the ediscovery production process. When I think of the thousands and sometimes millions of single page TIFFS that are routinely created from native files, I am reminded of the days when I first started out as a Paralegal for a law firm. Based in the unglamorous basement of the firms prestigious London offices I was surrounded by paper files with my trusty paginator in hand to help me weave order from this sea of thinly sliced trees. As a technologist, the ediscovery environment I work in some 20 years later has changed immeasurably. Tasks which would have previously have taken weeks can now take seconds. And yet, we are still often wedded to producing an archaic TIFF based output from corpus of data we have collected, culled, and analysed, utilising state of the art artificial intelligence software and then taking this output and converting to what is effectively ‘digital paper’.

While there are valid reasons for why some documents still need to be produced in TIFF, like in the case of redacted files, oftentimes it seems we employ and accept TIFF productions simply because we feel more comfortable with a familiar format.

Regardless of the reason, it’s critical to take the time at the outset of a case to consider your production protocol and come to a detailed agreement on a production format. While there is still no consensus on exactly the “right way” to design your productions, Rob Iuliano (my colleague) and I discuss the pros and cons in further detail in the eBook “To Tiff or Not To Tiff – Reasoning, Perils, and Pitfalls of Producing Documents as part of the eDiscovery Process.”

We hope you find the ebook informative and useful and if you would like to further discuss the pros and cons of your production format, please contact us at info@lhediscovery.com.

About the Author
Josh Yildirim

Director of Service Delivery, Europe

Josh brings over 20 years of complex litigation and ediscovery experience to his role. As Director of Service Delivery in Europe, he manages the production operations, solution analysts, project management, and hosted solutions teams to optimize how these groups come together around shared goals. In addition, he is responsible for managing and applying innovative solutions to drive efficiency, accuracy, and throughput when it comes to service delivery in Europe.

Prior to Lighthouse, Josh was an assistant director at Ernst & Young, where he helped run the forensic technology and ediscovery practice. Throughout his three-and-a-half-year tenure, he gained in-depth experience in identification through the presentation of electronic information linked to contentious matters in Europe, the US, the Far East, and Africa. He also had a specific remit to oversee the operational management of 100+ Forensic Technology team members and helped to develop Ernst & Young’s ediscovery strategy and solutions. Before Ernst & Young, he spent 13 years working as head of ediscovery at law firms Herbert Smith Freehills and Pinsent Masons.

Josh received his degree in Philosophy from the University of Glasgow and is PRINCE2 Project Management certified.